<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maximum Margin Matrix Factorization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/</link>
	<description>Bitheads Invade the Fashion World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:07:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>I had some good success at eBay/Shopping.com using a ranking SVMs.  So let me as a few questions?
Is there now an open source implementation that others can use, or do I need formulate this myself. I assume you have a high performance implementation...did you end up solving the dual or the primal?  Also, how would you compare using MMMF vs, say, using a combination of SVD + a Transductive SVM (that is, guess the labels, then use a transductive SVM to solve...and,  yes, I know MMMF is convex and this is not...but I can do this with existing code).    Overall--nice to see this--it is encouraging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had some good success at eBay/Shopping.com using a ranking SVMs.  So let me as a few questions?<br />
Is there now an open source implementation that others can use, or do I need formulate this myself. I assume you have a high performance implementation&#8230;did you end up solving the dual or the primal?  Also, how would you compare using MMMF vs, say, using a combination of SVD + a Transductive SVM (that is, guess the labels, then use a transductive SVM to solve&#8230;and,  yes, I know MMMF is convex and this is not&#8230;but I can do this with existing code).    Overall&#8211;nice to see this&#8211;it is encouraging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Rennie</title>
		<link>http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Hi Manu,

Yes, MMMF certainly can be used for binary data.  MMMF can be applied to data with any number of ordinal labels &gt;= 2.  In both the original NIPS MMMF paper, as well as the ICML Fast MMMF paper, you may have noticed that we used `R&#039; to represent the number of ordinal labels.  You can simply set R=2 for binary data.  This should simplify many of the expressions.  For my MMMF matlab code, pass 2 for the value of l for the gradient/objective function.

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Manu,</p>
<p>Yes, MMMF certainly can be used for binary data.  MMMF can be applied to data with any number of ordinal labels >= 2.  In both the original NIPS MMMF paper, as well as the ICML Fast MMMF paper, you may have noticed that we used `R&#8217; to represent the number of ordinal labels.  You can simply set R=2 for binary data.  This should simplify many of the expressions.  For my MMMF matlab code, pass 2 for the value of l for the gradient/objective function.</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manu</title>
		<link>http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>manu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Can MMMF be used for recommendation based on binary data (ie: i like/dislike this item) instead of rating data ? If so, could you point out any relevant publication.
I have trouble to figure that out.
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Can MMMF be used for recommendation based on binary data (ie: i like/dislike this item) instead of rating data ? If so, could you point out any relevant publication.<br />
I have trouble to figure that out.<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Rennie</title>
		<link>http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Hi Ruth,

MMMF can certainly be used for search.  Here at StyleFeeder, we use it to provide personalized search results, based on the ratings and bookmarks the user has provided.

By &quot;vector space model&quot;, I&#039;m guessing that you mean a dimensionality-reduction of the term-document matrix.  We don&#039;t use MMMF for that, but you certainly could.  You&#039;d need a different loss function (e.g. one based on the multinomial model).  With that and the trace norm regularization term, you&#039;d get a convex objective which yields a low-rank solution given a sufficiently large weight on the regularization term.  Do contact me if you have further interest/questions.

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ruth,</p>
<p>MMMF can certainly be used for search.  Here at StyleFeeder, we use it to provide personalized search results, based on the ratings and bookmarks the user has provided.</p>
<p>By &#8220;vector space model&#8221;, I&#8217;m guessing that you mean a dimensionality-reduction of the term-document matrix.  We don&#8217;t use MMMF for that, but you certainly could.  You&#8217;d need a different loss function (e.g. one based on the multinomial model).  With that and the trace norm regularization term, you&#8217;d get a convex objective which yields a low-rank solution given a sufficiently large weight on the regularization term.  Do contact me if you have further interest/questions.</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruth</title>
		<link>http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Can MMMF be used for vector space model search engine, such as SVD or NNMF (non-negative matrix factorisation) ?  IF so, could you please point out any publication that MMMF is used for search engine?  I have Google, but to no luck at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Can MMMF be used for vector space model search engine, such as SVD or NNMF (non-negative matrix factorisation) ?  IF so, could you please point out any publication that MMMF is used for search engine?  I have Google, but to no luck at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armynavy</title>
		<link>http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>armynavy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 03:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>My Style twins don&#039;t appear at all similar in tastes?
Why aren&#039;t these updated with our own recommendations and knowledge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Style twins don&#8217;t appear at all similar in tastes?<br />
Why aren&#8217;t these updated with our own recommendations and knowledge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whirlycott / Philip Jacob &#187; StyleFeeder Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Whirlycott / Philip Jacob &#187; StyleFeeder Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tech.stylefeeder.com/2007/07/30/maximum-margin-matrix-factorization/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog for those of you who are interested in the black magic that goes on behind the scenes here.  Jason&#8217;s been doing all of the writing so far, mainly about our CF recommendation engine and Fast [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog for those of you who are interested in the black magic that goes on behind the scenes here.  Jason&#8217;s been doing all of the writing so far, mainly about our CF recommendation engine and Fast [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
